For some uses, this is fine and may even add to the uniqueness of a take.

Where this might be an issue is just how it processes notes.Īutotune almost wants to always impart some of that autotune sound onto whatever you’re correcting. The graph mode is a lot like the UI of Melodyne, but it’s still the same engine as Autotune. These can take your vocals a long way and in some cases uses for needing natural sounding pitch correction, it can fill that role with its graph mode. The latest iteration of Autotune, Autotune X, even has a listening feature for the track you’re tuning for the vocal style - such as tenor, bass, or soprano. The catch with this plugin is that you have to know the keys in a scale or at least modern theory to not make it such a guessing game.Īntares Autotune is much more user-friendly who’s its full suite includes other plugins like Autokey which can detect the key of the record and send that information over to the plugin. This allows you to pitch things in areas the vocalist might not have been able even to do while still having it remain sounding natural. While it can be time-consuming it’s hard to argue against the results since it’s not doing a whole lot of the correction automatically. Melodyne’s engine excels at natural-sounding pitch correction but requires the user to dig in and manually adjust these notes.

If you wanted more of that T-Pain-esque sound, it might be better to use Antares Autotune. Typically, if you wanted your vocals to sound more natural without those robotic artifacts we so commonly associate with the sound of autotune, you’d choose something like Melodyne. If they do the same thing, why do a lot of producers and engineers use or have both?īoth Autotune and Melodyne are amazing at what they do, however, they excel at slightly different uses.

Uad antares autotune editing